Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 03:23
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
How often do prisoners try to escape from jail/prison, and how many of them succeed?
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Knicks get Jay Wright clarity in their head coach search - New York Post
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
The S&P 500 closes at 6,000 as bulls aim for return to record territory - MarketWatch
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Star Trek: Strange New Worlds is getting a fifth and final season - The Verge
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What is one thing you've learned from life?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
After 19 Years of Trying, She's Pregnant—Thanks to AI - Newser
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why stablecoin play Circle’s stock is still a buy even after a sixfold rally - MarketWatch
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.